Introduction to the Psalms
Tomorrow in our Daily Devotional we start reading in the Psalms. What are the Psalms?
The Psalms are a collection of Israel’s songs for meditation, wisdom,
and expressing love for and trust in the Lord.
The Psalms are religious poetry. Poetry is a language of images and comparisons. The religious context of the Psalms is Israel as the theocratic nation under the jurisdiction of the Mosaic Law.
While the Psalms are religious poetry, we need to remember that they were sung! With poetry the words are 1) Concentrated—less words are used than in normal writing and 2) Highly structured—great attention is given to how words are put together.
Poets often tell us what they are thinking and feeling by using comparisons (be especially aware when the words “like” or “as” are used).
Psalm 1:3 “He will be like a tree firmly planted by streams of water”
Psalm 84:11 “the Lord God is a sun and shield”
Poets also carefully put words together (“structure”) to focus on the overall message or topic of the Psalm. An especially important way they do this is by having two or more lines that strengthen, reinforce, and develop a main thought. This is called parallelism.
When there are parallel statements contrasts can be drawn (Ps 1:6), additional details provided (Ps 72:9), comparisons can be made (Ps 103:13), and many other functions.
The Psalms cover many different settings, so you need to interpret each Psalm individually.
The Psalms tells what believers in Israel knew and felt about the Lord and how a God-centered life in ancient Israel was lived. They are like a mirror for the soul. The emotions expressed in the Psalms are grounded in faith.
Psalms were used for—
- Public Worship in the Temple—Sung by Jews participating in the temple worship during national days of worship. Examples: Psalms 24, 100
- Private Worship in the Temple—Sung by individual Jews who came to the temple to offer sacrifices in keeping with the Mosaic Law. Example: Psalm 66:16–20
- Pilgrimage Songs—Sung by Jews as they made the three annual trips to the temple in Jerusalem. Examples: Psalms 120–134
There are different styles or types of psalms. We do the same thing, having different hymns for different occasions. While a Psalm can be a certain type there is often some overlap!
Lament: This is the most popular Psalm (over a third of the Psalms are laments). These are cries of distress by individuals or the entire nation. Enemies are not usually identified. Examples: 3, 7, 12, 13, 17, 26, 44, 60, 74.
Thanksgiving: Gratitude is expressed to God for help He has given. These also are from the perspective of both individuals and the entire nation. Examples: 18, 30, 32, 34, 40, 65, 66, 67, 75, 92, 107, 116, 118, 136, 138
Praise: This is the opposite end of the emotional spectrum from the laments. Here God is praised for His greatness and goodness. Examples: 8, 19, 29, 33, 66, 92, 100, 103, 104, 111, 113, 114, 117, 145, 146, 147, 148
Kingship and Covenant: These Psalms speak of God as king, expressing God’s rule over creation, the nation of Israel, and encouraging Israel to renew her allegiance to God and the Mosaic Covenant. Examples: 2, 18, 20, 24, 29, 45, 47, 89, 93, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 132
Trust: These Psalms express reliance on and confidence in the God of Israel. Examples: 11, 16, 23, 62, 63, 91, 121, 125
Wisdom: These Psalms emphasize the essential importance the Law has for living life skillfully and receiving God’s blessing. Examples: 1, 15, 36, 37, 49, 73, 112, 119, 127, 128, 133.
Remembrance: God’s deeds are remembered, often as a story. Examples: 78, 104, 106, 135, 136
Imprecatory: In these Psalms God’s people call on God to curse or judge various enemies. For Christians these can be difficult to comprehend! A large reason for this difficulty is we read these Psalms from our perspective, not theirs. In these Psalms God’s people Israel are zealous for God, hate sin, see those who love wickedness as God’s enemies, and thus call on a righteous and holy God to defend His character and Laws. These are not personal vendettas but expressions of holy jealousy for God and His nation Israel. They are based on the covenants, especially the Abrahamic and Mosaic.
Examples: 7, 35, 55, 58, 59, 69, 79, 109, 137, 139, 140
How Can You Gain a Better
Understanding of the Psalms?
Remember to read each psalm as a whole, as a complete unit! Ask and answer five questions—
1. What type of psalm is this?
2. What is the historical setting?
1) Check the superscription (if there is one) and any information in the Psalm itself
2) This necessarily involves remembering that the Psalm was written in the context of Israel as the theocratic nation, under the jurisdiction of the Mosaic Law.
3) Also be aware of cultural aspects (farming, shepherding, and their way of doing war)
3. What is the subject or topic of the Psalm?
1) The controlling topic is usually found in the first few verses. Remember, the Psalmist is expressing thoughts, emotions or responding to specific situations.
2) The topic can be stated in different ways.
3) It’s extremely important to recognize that the whole Psalm is designed to convey a theme or topic. You must understand your favorite verses in light of how they contribute to developing the theme (Psalm 139:14 for example). In fact, if you don’t see a verse in the context of the Psalm you actually distort its meaning!
Example: Roses are red, Violets are blue, Sugar is sweet, and so are you. The point isn’t about the color of flowers! J
4. How is the topic developed?
1) Major part of the poem’s structure is development of the topic
2) Subject is developed in four different ways:
a. Contrast (Psalm 1) righteous and the wicked
b. Listing of items associated with the subject (Psalm 23) Subject: God’s care – like a shepherd
c. Relationship (Psalm 19) Creation and God’s Word
d. Repetition by metaphors or illustrations (Psalm 133) brothers dwelling “together in unity…is like the precious oil upon the head…it is like the dew of Hermon”
5. How does the Psalm end?
1) Summary statement, Psalm 1:6
2) Prayer, Psalm 19:14
3) Exhortation, Psalm 32:11
Conclusion of a Brief History of the Baptist Church in Foxborough, MA
You can read the previous posts here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, and Part 7.
THE PASTORATE OF 1869 TO 1879.
The sudden and unexpected termination of Mr. Spencer’s pastorate soon after the delivery of the Historical Discourse, makes it fitting that a fuller record of the events that marked his connection with this church should appear in this place.
The introduction of the Service of Song in the place of the Psalmist, in December, 1871, was designed to promote congregational singing, and the result has been a far more general participation by the people in this part of the Sabbath worship than was known before, and a better appreciation of pure psalmody.
The revival during the winter of 1874 is gratefully remembered as a season of great spiritual awakening in the church and in the community. It was manifestly a work of the Holy Spirit, and was traceable to no special instrumentalities or methods of work. It seemed to be the result of the faithful use of the ordinary means of grace—the ministry of the word and prayer. The revival followed close upon the annual Week of Prayer, to the surprise and great joy of both churches, which shared about equally in the fruits of the precious work of grace. Special meetings were continued for about seven weeks. The results of that revival season include not alone the forty-four persons that were added to the church by baptism, but also an infusion of new spiritual life and harmony in the church. The seasons of spiritual quickening that have since been enjoyed, though not so wide-spread, were rendered possible by the greater blessing of 1874. During the winter of 1875 the South Foxboro neighborhood was blessed by a special outpouring of the Spirit, in connection with the labors of brother Daniel Jones, since ordained to the work of the gospel ministry at Pocasset, Mass. Twenty-five persons were added to the church as a result of that work—an addition, bringing with it increased responsibilities and a call for wider sympathies and a more unremitting watch-care on the part of this church. The spring of 1876 and also of 1877 were both marked by special religious interest in this church and congregation, resulting in considerable additions to the church.
During the past four years, the pastor of this church has aided to sustain regular preaching in the neighborhoods of East Foxboro and South Foxboro, where a few earnest brethren and sisters had long carried on Sabbath Schools. Mr. Spencer inaugurated occasional preaching services in East Foxboro, Oct. 1, 1871. A Chapel has since been built in each of those neighborhoods by the united efforts of members of different denominations, and the pastors in the surrounding neighborhoods supply the pulpits.
One of the pleasant things to be remembered in connection with this pastorate is the visit of Rev. E. A. Stevens, D. D., and his son, with their wives, missionaries to the Burmans. Their temporary residence in this place brought the church into a fuller sympathy with Foreign Missions, and gave an impulse to the missionary spirit here, which ought to be permanent.
In the statistics of this pastorate given in the Discourse the following changes and additions should appear. There have been added by baptism one hundred and twenty-one; by letter thirty-nine; by experience thirteen; restored, two; total received one hundred and seventy-five. There have been removed by death, thirty; by letter, forty-six; by erasure, sixteen; and by exclusion, nine; total one hundred and one, showing a net gain of seventy-four. The number of additions has exceeded the entire membership of the church in 1869.
The interest of the church has been absorbed during the past year by the work of repairs and alterations in their house of worship. This work has been marked by a gratifying unanimity in interest and effort. Contributions have been received from one hundred and seventy-five members of the church and congregation varying in amount from twenty-five cents to hundreds of dollars, while substantial tokens of God will have also come from some who are not in any way connected with us.
The work of remodeling the church was put into the hand of a building committee consisting of William Carpenter, Deacon Elisha White, Henry T. Comey, William B. Crocker, with the pastor. The extent and cost of the alterations in the house are as follows: The entire building was raised two feet and four inches. The old laths and plaster of the entire interior were replaced by new. Additional space was gained for the vestibule and gallery by carrying the front of the church out against the pillars. The building was lengthened by an addition of eight feet on the rear, giving room for an ample pulpit platform and baptistery, a room for the pastor’s use on one side and an organ room on the other. Below, the additional space is occupied by two ante-rooms and a kitchen. The walls and ceiling of the auditorium were tastefully frescoed, the old windows were replaced by new ones made of stained cathedral glass, and the church was entirely refurnished with new ash pews, cushions, carpet and pulpit furniture. The rose window in the pulpit recess was given by the pastor as a memorial of his little daughter, Mary Lincoln, whose earthly life began and ended in his Foxboro home. The vestry was supplied with a pair of new furnaces and with new lamps. The house was re-shingled and painted, and the spire was strengthened by the addition of a strong new truss at its base. A new grade was established in front of the church and concrete walks were laid. The entire cost of the alterations was in round numbers $6600, of which about $5500 was raised by subscription and other means, leaving about $1100 to be raised.
This work was no sooner completed than the church was brought to face another change, little expected and deeply regretted by all. On the very day when the church was rededicated, the pastor received an intimation that this was not his rest. By the morning mail he received an invitation from the Baptist church in Waterville, Me., to visit them with a view to becoming their pastor. The visit was postponed for two weeks, but the result was a call to change his field of labor, which, after careful consideration, he did not feel at liberty to reject. His resignation was reluctantly offered amid expressions of profound regret on Sabbath day, March 2, to take effect the last day of the month.
Part 7 of a Brief History of the Baptist Church in Foxborough, MA
You can read the previous posts here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, and Part 6.
In the Summer of 1854, Mr. Ripley announced his intention of leaving the first of September. He left behind him the warm regard of many, to whom his “able and faithful preaching, and his kind, Christian intercourse” had endeared him. He continued for some years longer in the active work of the ministry in various places; and finally, while residing at Hingham, he entered into rest, May 6, 1868, leaving but a few moments’ warning of his death.”
His successor, Rev. Isaac Smith, for twenty-three years pastor of the Baptist church in Stoughton, had long been favorably known to this church, and, indeed, had once before received a call to come here, which he had declined. This later call, however, he accepted October 2, 1854, and was enthusiastically received by admiring friends. He removed his family hither the first day of November, a tenement having been providentially vacated for them by the death of its occupant, at a time when no tenement could have been otherwise obtained for several months. Tokens of new life and prosperity soon appeared. A revival of unusual power was enjoyed during the following Winter. A debt of $1600, which had embarrassed the church for four years, was half paid off, and an unusual degree of liberality prevailed. It was a prosperous period in the history of the town. Improvements and enlargement were the order of the day. The Congregationalists had just built, in 1854, the handsome edifice in which they now worship. Rock-hill Cemetery had been set apart for its sacred use a year or two before. The Baptist church shared the spirit of improvement. In 1856, an organ was procured by dint of special exertions, the same instrument that we use today. Up to this time, the church had but one place for all its meetings, including those of the Sunday School, the place where we are now assembled. In the same year, 1856, a portion of the basement of the house was finished and fitted up as a vestry, the first of a series of improvements in that line, resulting in the pleasant accommodations now enjoyed by us on the floor below. In 1860, the need of better accommodations for prayer meetings led to the work of finishing the entire basement, thus giving a commodious room for the use of the Sunday School, and the social meetings of the church. This church shared in the great religious interest of 1857–58. The number of its members was increased to one hundred and ninety-nine.
The ministry of Dr. Smith in this place is of too recent date, and is too fresh in the minds of most of you, to require of me the attempt to set forth its character and results. Still I cannot be denied the pleasure of bearing testimony to the impression which his ability as a preacher, and his kindness as a friend and pastor, evidently made upon this church and community. During his pastorate of more than twelve years, the church acquired increasing power and influence. They had a leader inferior to none in this region, in ability to defend the truth. It caused them no little pain to lose his valued services. He was permitted to welcome to the membership of the church one hundred and six by baptism, thirty-two by letter and thirteen by experience, making a total of one hundred and fifty one.
He resigned the office of pastor January 3, 1867, and for about ten months, the pulpit was supplied by students from Newton, and other men. On Sunday, November 8, in the same year, you extended a call to Rev. Cyrus H. Carleton, who had for four years been pastor of the Baptist church in Buckfield, Maine. The call was accepted, and he immediately entered upon his labors among you. But they were destined to be brief. He gave himself earnestly to the work of a pastor, and was permitted, not only to sow good seed, but also to gather some fruit. But in less than a year from the time of his settlement here, consumption [tuberculosis] fastened upon him. “He preached his last sermon in August, and on Christmas night, he fell asleep in Jesus.” He is the only minister that ever died, in the service, in Foxboro. He sleeps in our beautiful cemetery, and, by his side, the child that was born to him in his Foxboro home.
Then, you turned to Newton students again for the supply of your pulpit. Mr. W. T. Chase, of the Senior class, might have been your pastor; but God had other work for him to do in Dover, N. H., and Lewiston, Maine.
My own acquaintance with you began in what may properly be called a providential way, with no special seeking on my part, or yours either. I well remember the pleasant Sabbath I first spent with you in March, 1869, little expecting that I should ever visit the place again, or that you would wish to have me do so. But the same Providence that brought me here as a temporary supply, ordered that this should be my home, and on September 2, in the same year, I began my pastoral labors with you.
And now, about this pastorate, of which I know the most, I shall say the least. I can do no less, however, than refer to the happy relations, which have always subsisted between us. If my pastorate here has been fruitful in any degree, it has been owing as much to your hearty and united cooperation with the pastor, as to anything in his words or methods of work. We have enjoyed special seasons of revival together, one especially, in the Winter of 1874, that will not soon be forgotten. It has been my privilege to give the hand of welcome and of fellowship to one hundred and seventy, of whom one hundred and twenty-one were received by baptism, thirty-five by letter, and fourteen by experience. We have for years looked forward with longing to the time when we might worship in a house refitted and beautified, and today we see the happy consummation of our hopes. We have passed through a year of strenuous endeavors and of anxiety, but we have come out at peace among ourselves. And now, with the blessing of the great Head of the church on our labors, we may reasonably hope to exert a greater influence and power for good than ever before.
As we- have seen, the history of this church presents little that is of striking interest. There has been nothing remarkable to record. Nor is there anything to regret in this fact. A quiet history is one of the results of harmony and discretion in the conduct of affairs. This church has never been given to hasty, impulsive counsels. On the contrary, it may justly be called somewhat slow and conservative. It does not take quickly to new methods. It clings to the things that have been tried and proved. It has always believed in the permanency of the pastoral office, as is shown by the fact that during the fifty one years in which it has had pastors, forty-nine years were consumed in five pastorates, a fact, which is, no doubt, as much to the credit of the church as to that of its pastors.
The Roll of all the members, who have been for any time connected with this church, comprises six hundred and seventy-four names, of whom four hundred and forty-nine were added by baptism. Of the whole number, one hundred and twenty-nine died in the fellowship of this church. What memories of faith and patience, of simple piety and tried fidelity, their names suggest! Some of you have known them all. You remember the devout and unassuming piety of Ezra Carpenter, the minute-man of the Revolution, and the ready follower of Christ as well. You will never forget Deacon Torrey, whose sturdy faith rose above all difficulties, and of whom his pastor, Mr. Ripley, once said, “It is my deliberate conviction that it is chiefly owing to his patient efforts from year to year, his unconquerable energy, and unsparing liberality, that the Baptist church in Foxboro has lived and prospered.”’ And with his name you couple that of Nehemiah Carpenter, whose reputation for sterling goodness and unselfish devotion to Christ and His cause is still fresh and fragrant. “Good as gold” is the universal comment on his character, in view of which our hearts echo the inspired saying: “A good name is rather to be chosen than great riches.” You remember Deacon Whittemore, whose little confidence in himself only rendered more conspicuous his confidence in Christ; and at his side that cheerful saint, mother Whittemore, affectionately zealous for souls and loving the church to the last. And what can I more say? For time would fail me to tell of Elijah Pratt and Timothy Morse, of Betsey Comey and Clarissa Comey, of Susan Allen and Patty Allen and other men and women, who labored in the gospel, whose names are in the Book of Life. Other names, still borne on earth by those who were long associated in labors with the sainted dead, leap to the lips, but propriety forbids me to utter them. We know them and love them, and rejoice that they are with us today to behold the fruit of their labors.
In closing this sketch, the imperfections of which no one knows better than I do, I would simply hold up before the church of today its past history, and point to its lessons and bright examples. Remember the patience of your elders, amid sore trials and discouragements, and their steadfast adherence to truths which were unpopular. Remember their reliance on the old and tried methods of Christian work, on the faithful preaching of the gospel, accompanied by the earnest prayers and labors of the church. Remember their self-sacrificing devotion to the church they loved. Remember the spirit of harmony that reigned among them, and kept them a united band, strong even when they were weakest. And with such memories filling the past, hope may well inspire us with fresh zeal to enter into the larger opportunities that open before us.
And now our labor of love is completed. The House of the Lord is ready for His gracious entrance. Now let the King of Glory come in, and let the cloud of the Divine Presence descend and fill the place. May He who dwelleth not in temples made with hands, whom the, heaven of heavens cannot contain, much less this house which we have builded, consent to dwell here with the poor and contrite heart, that trembleth at his word. And let us listen for the word of the Lord saying, “I will be the glory in the midst of her.”
To be concluded next week…
God’s Plan for Human History
When studying the book that completes God’s revealed truth and ties everything together, you must have a proper understanding of what precedes and leads up to it.
There must be a correct understanding of the Bible’s content (particularly with regard to Israel) and theology (particularly with regard to the church) in order to correctly interpret and apply the truths God has revealed in Revelation.
To put in another way, “Act I” leads to the conclusion in “Act II,” but “Act II” must be read in the light of “Act I” or else its meaning will be missed.
The Bible has a theme or purpose that includes, influences, unifies, and ties everything in the Bible together. Without understanding this over-arching, unifying theme, the Bible will just seem to be a collection of different stories and letters. Or, you may see something else as the main theme of the Bible, resulting in a wrong interpretation and application of different passages.
1. God’s Purpose in History
1) The motivation behind everything God does is His glory.
- God’s “glory” is the esteem that rational beings (humans and angels) have for God because of who He is and what He has done— when we “see” God for who He is, as He has been revealed in the Bible
“Esteem” – regard, respect, admiration, value, worth, appreciation
Romans 11:36 “For from Him and through Him and to Him are all things. To Him be the glory forever. Amen.”
1 Corinthians 15:28 “When all things are subjected to Him, then the Son Himself also will be subjected to the One who subjected all things to Him, so that God may be all in all”
Colossians 1:16 “all things have been created through Him and for Him”
2) Everything exists and happens for God’s glory, and God works that purpose out in history. In the Bible God has revealed His plan of glorifying Himself. What does the Bible say how God will accomplish His plan of receiving maximum glory from human beings?
3) God will ultimately glorify Himself in human history in the Kingdom of God—God will lovingly rule and dwell with His people on earth forever. This is the unifying center, the ultimate purpose/goal of God’s activity. This is the goal of human history. This is what ties everything in the Bible together.
A two-fold relationship is involved in God’s ultimate purpose—
- “I will be their God and they will be my people”
This relationship began with the creation of man as the image of God (Gen 1:26–27). Eventually, this relationship was expressed in covenants. See Gen 17:7 (Abraham); Lev 11:45 (Mosaic); Jer 24:7; Zech 8:8; 13:9 (New)
- “I will dwell among them”
This relationship began when God walked with Adam and Eve in the Garden (Gen 3:8). God did this in what theologians call a Christophany, an appearance of Christ in human form before the incarnation. After the Fall God’s “dwelling” with men was probably in sporadic Christophanies. There was no permanent, visible dwelling of God after the Fall until the Glory Cloud and the eventual construction of God’s “house” (the Tabernacle).
Study these passages for more on this theme—Gen 3:8; 17:7–8; Exod 6:7; 19:5–6; 20:24; 25:8; 29:45; Lev 11:45; 26:12, 45; Num 5:3; 35:34; Deut 12:5, 11; 29:13; 2 Chr 7:12; Ps 46:7, 11; Isa 51:16; Jer 7:23; 11:4; 13:11; 24:7; 30:22; 31:1, 33; 32:38; Ezek 11:20; 14:11; 34:30–31; 36:28; 37:23–28; 43:9; Hos 2:23; Zech 2:5, 10–11; 8:3, 8; 13:9; 2 Cor 6:16; Rev 21:7
4) The greatest display of God’s glory on earth in human history will be during the millennium—the Kingdom of God—when God will enter into a rule of loving sovereignty and fellowship with His people and dwell with them forever (Ezek 37:23–28; Zech 8:3, 8). This is what all of human history is leading to and working toward.
5) When the Kingdom of God is established, God will receive the maximum glory possible on the historical plane. God’s glory is not fully visible now. It will be, beginning with Christ’s Second Coming. How will God’s glory be made fully visible among men in human history?
- In relation to the earth, the curse will be removed before the new heavens and the new earth are formed (cf. Rom 8:18-25)
- In relation to the animal world, all the animals will live in harmony with each other (Isa 11:6-9)
- All mankind will live in subjection to the King of glory (Phil 2:10-11)
- As Christ’s bride, the church will share in the glory of Christ’s redemption (Rev 19:7-9)
- Satan will be absent during this time (Rev 20:1-3) and Christ’s glory will not be hidden
- Open sin will be supernaturally judged (Zech 14:17–19)
So, you need to always keep this theme in the back of your mind when studying the Bible. Always remember that…
(1) Everything exists and happens for God’s glory.
(2) God will receive maximum glory from human beings in human history.
(3) When Christ comes and establishes His Kingdom on earth, God will lovingly rule and dwell with His people on earth forever.
Study Sheet on God’s Covenants with Israel
These questions will help prepare you for next Sunday afternoon’s lesson which will focus on God’s four covenants with Israel.
1. Read Genesis 12:1–3.
1) Who did God make this covenant with, what people are involved in it?
2) What three things did God promise?
3) Did God say that something had to be done in order to enjoy these promises?
2. Survey (or read) Deuteronomy 28.
1) Who did God make this covenant with, what people are involved in it?
2) What did God’s blessings depend on?
3) What would happen if those conditions were not fulfilled?
3. Read 2 Samuel 7:1–17.
1) Who did God make this covenant with, what people are involved in it?
2) What three things did God promise?
4. Read Jeremiah 31:27–40.
1) Who did God make this covenant with, what people are involved in it?
2) In verses 33–40 what promises did God make?
Part 6 of a Brief History of the Baptist Church in Foxborough, MA
You can read the previous posts here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and Part 5.
The church was fortunate in securing a successor to Mr. Tingley, without any long waiting. He preached his last sermon, August 6. 1837. During the remainder of that month, the pulpit was supplied by Rev. Caleb Shute of Boston. On the third of September, Rev. Silas Ripley preached here the first time, and in the following month he became your pastor.
Of his labors for this church much more might be said than I have the time to say. His connection with you, including two years’ interruption, extended through seventeen years. Many changes occurred in the circumstances of the church during his long pastorate. He had been here but a few months, when the church was much weakened by the withdrawal of thirty-four members, to form a new church in Mansfield. That church was organized June 6, 1838. This movement, though cordially agreed to by the mother church, drew off one third of her active members, and probably more than one half of her pecuniary strength. It rendered necessary, or at least, hastened another movement also.
The site for the meeting-house had been chosen partly with reference to the convenience of the southeastern portions of the church, which the successive swarms to Norton and Mansfield had drawn off. It was now deemed best to seek a more central location for their house of worship. It was accordingly moved up into the village. The Records of the church give no account of this removal, but tradition has preserved an interesting report of the vote that decided the action. It was a measure of which it was easy enough to see the necessity, but for which no one wished to take any degree of responsibility. A church meeting was appointed, to consider the matter. On the day appointed, no one appeared except Deacon Torrey and Nehemiah Carpenter. After waiting a long time, until it was evident that no more members were coming, Deacon Torrey, in his straightforward way, said to the other, “Brother Carpenter, is it our duty to move this meeting-house?” The brother mildly replied that he thought it ought to be done. “Then,” said the deacon, in his blunt fashion, “We’ll move it.” And the next day saw the work begun under Deacon Torrey’s supervision. In moving the house such a distance, it was necessary to saw it in two, and move each portion separately on wheels, which provoked the remark from someone not over friendly to the church, that, “now they’d got the Baptist meetin-house on wheels, they’d better keep it on wheels and run it out o’ town.” Instead of doing that, however, they moved it to one of the finest lots in the village, a gift to the church by Mr. Nehemiah Carpenter. It was the lot now occupied by the Town Hall and Centre Schoolhouse. The building was enlarged by the addition of twelve feet to its length, and the basement was finished off as a vestry, the work being carried forward by the strenuous efforts and generous sacrifices of all. The further fortunes of that building may be briefly stated here. It stood on its new site for about twelve years longer, until a new church was built on this spot in 1850. It was then sold at auction, moved over into Gilmore Street, and transformed into a box-factory. Finally, in the evening of January 27, 1876, the last vestige of the old Baptist meeting-house was swept away by the most disastrous fire that ever occurred in our village.
The first pastorate of Mr. Ripley closed in June, 1841. For about a year, the church depended on supplies, mainly from Newton. In May, 1842, Rev. Edwin B. Bullard responded, to their call, and became their pastor. He remained only one year, and then resigned, to accept an appointment by the Missionary Union. He was a man of deep religious earnestness and intense zeal. His preaching was direct and pungent, and his labors were crowned with success. The church was revived, and souls were saved. He was permitted to baptize twenty-two persons during his brief sojourn here. In May, 1843, his connection with this church ceased, and he was transferred to a wider field. As a missionary to the Karens of Burma, he threw himself into the work with a fiery zeal, which soon consumed him. He died of cholera at Maulmain, April 5, 1847, at the age of thirty-three.
Rev. Silas Ripley was called to succeed him, and entered immediately upon his second pastorate here. Though neither of his pastorates was signalized by any great revival, or by large accessions to the church, still his labors were of the most useful and necessary kind. His work here was one of training and pruning and cultivation. He was patient, thorough and methodical. His preaching was sound and instructive. He commanded the respect, and won the love, of his people. He was a good man and a genial friend. The growth of the church was slow, but steady, under his leadership. To use his own words, “though favored with no extraordinary degree of prosperity, it was enabled to hold on its way and maintain its position.”
We can only glance at the principal events and changes worthy of note in this period. In 1843, the old parsonage was sold, and steps were taken towards building a new one in a more convenient location. The work was completed near the end of 1844. Deacon Torrey appears as the chief promoter of this work, as he had been of all the building enterprises upon which the church had entered up to that time.
In 1844, August 11, we find the church voting to introduce the Psalmist, as their hymn-book. Up to that time they had used the old collection denominated Winchell’s Watts. It may be added just here, that the Psalmist was superseded by the Service of Song, December 17, 1871.
Was there ever a village church, whose serenity was not at some time disturbed by restless boys? We find in the Records of 1844 a pointed reference to “certain lads, who have occasioned considerable disturbance in some of our meetings of late.” A committee was appointed to “look after” them, consisting of Deacon Torrey, Henry L. Sweet, Alfred Fales, Seth Sherman and Deacon Whittemore. The Records give no account of the result, but it is my opinion that a solemn stillness, if not a holy calm, came over those lads, under the eyes of a committee composed as that was.
A curious entry occurs in the Records of 1845, showing the pastor’s quiet sense of humor. The church had agreed unanimously to adopt the recommendation of the Association, to observe the last Wednesday in October as a day of fasting, humiliation and prayer, on account of the low state of religion in the churches. “Only the pastor was present,” he remarks, and then adds, “It was well attended.”
We come to the year 1849, and find the church again stirred up to the work of removal and enlargement. The old meeting-house had served its purpose, and must give place to a more modem structure. A wise policy, convenience and comfort, all urged the congregation to arise and build. Still the pecuniary ability of the church was small. Not only the house was sold, to raise the necessary funds, but it’s beautiful site as well. The parsonage too was sold, and great exertions were made to meet the expense of a new lot and building. A faithful and efficient Building Committee, consisting of Deacon Torrey, brethren Henry D. Aldrich and Alfred Fales, was entrusted with the work, and on the fifteenth of August, 1850, this house was dedicated to the worship of God. The pastor preached the sermon, and was assisted in the services by Rev. N. G. Lovell, of North Attleboro, Rev. E. C. Messinger, of Medway, and Rev. James W. Russell, of Cumberland Hill.
The next year, the church, in the exuberance of its joy at being settled in a new and comfortable home, invited the Association to enjoy its hospitality. “The session was one of great harmony and religious interest.” A gracious work of the Holy Spirit followed in the Autumn and Winter of 1850 and 1851. Not many were added to the church, but the cold and sluggish life of the church received a new, divine impulse.
To be continued next week…
Part 4 of a Brief History of the Baptist Church in Foxborough, MA
You can read the previous posts here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3.
As early as December, 1818, the church, in its feebleness, had begun to cherish the purpose of “providing a place of worship,” and had appointed a committee “to form the design, make arrangements and report at some future meeting.” Just two years and nine months later, we find that committee again instructed “to take that subject [of building a meeting-house] into consideration, as soon as may be, and report whether to build, where to build, what size to build and how to defray the expense.” We may be sure that it was not from a lack of interest in the matter, that some action was not sooner reached; for Martin Torrey was at the head of the committee, and that fact in itself was enough to insure the doing of all that could be done. Finally, March 6, 1822, a new committee, with the same chairman, was appointed, with instructions “to procure a spot for a meeting-house, and make all needful arrangements for the erection of one the present year.” This proved to be the signal for action; for on Wednesday, October 30, the new meeting-house was opened for the worship of God. The pastor preached a sermon from John 4:24—“God is a Spirit; and they that worship Him, must worship Him in spirit and in Truth.” The Rev. Messrs. Barrett and Houghton, and brother John Allen assisted in the solemn and joyful services of the occasion. The church was located near the house now occupied by Mr. Asahel Dean, about three-quarters of a mile southeast of the Common. The cost of building it was about $1200 [about $20,400 in 2013], and was provided for by the sale of the pews. The structure was of the simplest possible kind—a plain, rectangular building, about thirty-six by forty feet, without tower or belfry.
In the porch stood a big, box-shaped stove, with its long funnel passing through the house. It is not to be supposed that this warmed the whole house in the winter. It was enough if the worshippers could have a chance to warm their hands and feet at the beginning and the end of the service. Such luxury was never before known in a Foxboro meeting-house. There were two doors in the front end, and the pulpit stood between them. A raised platform eight or ten inches high, across the other end of the house, served as a gallery for the singers, who were shielded from the public gaze by a curtain, except when they rose to sing.
Martin Torrey was the soul of the building enterprise, in which he was also heartily seconded by the pastor and Freedom Guild, members with him of the building committee. Such an undertaking deserves to be remembered with gratitude; for it was “viewed by some as almost desperate,” in the feeble condition of the church, while, at the same time, all entered into the work with the “happiest unanimity.”
The building enterprise proved to be a wise one, and the seal of the divine approval was soon given. In the following year, twelve members of the Baptist church in Sharon, residing in this town, offered their letters, and contributed their strength to this church. Other additions, by letter and by baptism, swelled the increase to twenty-four during the year 1823. The church was also cheered, in the following year, by a revival on its south-eastern border. In the course of a few months, eighteen persons, residing in the town of Norton, about eight miles distant, were added to their number by baptism, and were considered and treated as a branch of the church in Foxboro, the pastor visiting them and preaching for them as often as he could. This revival, the fruit of the labors of Rev. William Bentley, is described as “still and gradual and solemn in its progress, embracing in its results probably more than double the number that united with this church.” The records show additions to the number of twenty-three during that year, 1824.
Thus in two years the church had more than doubled its numbers, and might hope that its worst trials were over. But such a hope, if it were cherished, was doomed to disappointment. For at this point the record of increase comes to a long and painful pause. From August, 1824, to June, 1881, nearly seven years, not one was baptized, and only two were added by letter. This barrenness in the record finds its explanation in the unhappy state of affairs in the church. Their trouble was of the most trying sort, namely, the defection of their pastor. He became unsettled in his religious beliefs, and for a time was carried away by the error of Universal Restoration [everyone will be saved]. Notwithstanding their respect and love for their pastor and brother, the church were constrained by the advice of a council, April 13, 1825, to suspend him from the pastoral office, and finally from the privileges of a church-member. Having renounced his errors, he was again restored by a council to the ministry, received back into the church in full fellowship and reinstated in the pastoral office. His defection lasted a little more than two years, from September, 1824, to November, 1826. For a year or more after this, he continued the regular labors of a pastor; but, the state of his health forbidding close study, on the seventh of October, 1828, his resignation of the pastorate was offered and accepted. About two years later, having united with a Swedenborgian church [which denies the Trinity, among other beliefs] in Boston, he, of course, lost his standing in this church. He continued to reside in Foxboro, and died here in 1861. He is remembered by the older members of this church with great respect. He was with them in their first trials, and labored for them with unselfish zeal. During his vagaries in belief, he did not seek to trouble or divide the church, and they treated him with kindness and consideration. As a citizen he was respected and honored till his death.
To be continued next week…
Part 3 of a Brief History of the Baptist Church in Foxborough, MA
You can read the previous posts here: Part 1, Part 2.
Behold, then, this little band of brethren and sisters, gathered at the house of Elias Nason, Esq., on the morning of Wednesday, April 16th, 1817. It was something of a venture for them to assume the responsibilities of an independent organization. Baptist churches were few and feeble in those days, and had strong prejudices to encounter. There was no State Convention to which they might look for help. Of the thirty-nine churches that now comprise the Boston South Baptist Association, only five were in existence, and two of them were less than three years old, and scarcely able to stand alone.
The council, that assembled at the call of the disciples in Foxboro, assented, not without some misgivings, to the request of the thirty-seven for recognition as a church. In the records of that council, we find the names of Rev. Stephen Gano, then pastor of the First Baptist church in Providence; Rev. Stephen S. Nelson, from North Attleboro; Rev. Shubael Lovell, from Taunton ; Rev. Joseph Torrey, Jr., from Pembroke ; brother Samuel Wait, who was ordained in the following year as pastor of the church in Sharon, and Rev. William Gammell, of Medfield.
The services of recognition were held in the old Parish meeting-house. There is a reliable tradition, that, by a vote of the parish, the doors had been closed against the Baptists, but that Mr. Beriah Mann, the Town Clerk, who held the power of the keys, admitted them on his own responsibility, thus giving to the occasion all the dignity that could be conferred by the sacred associations of lofty pulpit and sounding board. I mention this, as a curious bit of ancient history, suggesting the great contrast between the intolerant spirit that reigned then, and the liberty of opinion that is freely accorded today to men of all creeds and of no creed. I cannot deny myself, the pleasure of referring, in this connection, to the generous hospitality and warm welcome extended to us by the Congregational church during the past few months, while we were temporarily destitute of a church home. The kindness, so cordially offered, was as gratefully accepted, and both peoples took sweet counsel together in truest Christian fellowship.
The services of that day, nearly sixty-two years ago, are, I doubt not, still fresh in the minds of a few here present. Elder Gano preached the sermon, taking for his text the Psalm 132:17–18 “There will I make the horn of David to bud: I have ordained a lamp for my anointed. His enemies will I clothe with shame; but upon himself shall his crown flourish.” Rev. John Allen, who supplies this information, remembers the powerful appeal to the impenitent at the close of the sermon, and how the tears flowed down the cheeks of the speaker. Rev. Stephen S. Nelson gave the right hand of fellowship to the church, brother John Allen having been appointed to receive it as their representative. Rev. William Gammell offered the concluding prayer.
Thus the little light was kindled. A lamp was ordained. Who could tell whether it would flicker and go out before the breath of opposition to which it was exposed, or live to bless the community with its radiance?
The church, at its organization, adopted the Articles of Faith, Practice and Covenant of the Baptist churches in Wrentham and Attleboro, with some slight verbal alteration.
During the first five years of its existence the church had no pastor, being too feeble to undertake the support of one. Still, they enjoyed the frequent ministrations of preachers of their own denomination, and the administration of the ordinances. It has been found impossible to ascertain the names of all who supplied the place of religious guides and teachers to them during the period named. It appears, however, that, during the first year. Rev. Shubael Lovell was their stated supply. The church was accustomed to meet for worship at his residence, in the house then owned by Rev. Thomas Skelton, the ruins of which may still be seen on Mr. David Lewis Shepard’s place, on South St. Mr. Lovell is remembered as a man of good abilities, as sound in doctrine, and a good, instructive preacher. At the beginning of the second year, the church voted to request Mr. Lovell to preach for them once in two months, he having moved to Bridgewater. About this time they began also to look to one of their own number, as likely to become their minister.
They had licensed Warren Bird to preach, June 8th, 1817, and they now desired him to supply them every fortnight.
The first vote on record, committing the church to any pecuniary obligation, is found under date of May fifth, 1818, when it was agreed “to give four dollars a Sabbath for preaching.” This was coupled with a vote to procure preaching for half of the Sabbaths if possible. One hundred dollars per year seems a sufficiently modest sum for a church of forty members to raise for religious purposes. Nothing could give us a more vivid picture of their poverty. We look in vain through the records for any further account of the ministrations enjoyed by them; nor can we glean from the recollections of the oldest members a very clear account of the history of that period of the church.
During the first five and a half years, the church had no regular place of worship. They met at private houses, now in the house of Warren Bird, at the north-east corner of the Common, and now with Martin Torrey in South Foxboro; now with Ezra Carpenter on South Street, and now with Joshua Stearns in the neighborhood of the Furnace. Those were years of sore trial to the little band of believers. Besides the unfriendly attitude of the older church, and of the outside world, they had causes of grief among themselves. During the first six years only seven were added to their number, while two were removed by death, and six were excluded.
The year 1822 witnessed some improvement in their outward state. For, in the course of that year, they chose their first regular pastor and came into possession of a meeting-house. Their chosen pastor was the same brother, who had already served them as a frequent supply for three or four years, namely: Warren Bird. He had been ordained as an “evangelist,” at North Randolph, Nov. 3, 1819, and had served that church as its pastor with cheering results from April, 1820 to May, 1821, when ill health compelled him to seek relief. His home was still in Foxboro. He was still a member of this church; and after his labors at North Randolph ceased, he seems to have commenced preaching again for this church. Finally, it was voted, March 24, 1822, that he “be the Pastor of this church so long as he shall continue to labor with us.”’ A few days before this, the terms of settlement had been arranged. The record cannot fail to interest us all. It reads thus: “Voted cordial acceptance of an offer by W. Bird to supply the pulpit one year gratis, and, that he may, if he desire it, be absent four sabbaths.”
To be continued next week…
Part 2 of a Brief History of the Baptist Church in Foxborough, MA
Part 1 of this account is here.
As we have seen, there was apparently not much room for a Baptist church in this town in 1814. How then did it happen that only about two years later a Baptist church of thirty-seven members obtained a standing here? The answer to this question is found in the history of one of the most notable revivals of religion that was ever known in this region. It is a matter for grateful recollection, that this church had its birth in a genuine revival. There are some here today, who date the beginning of their hope of salvation from that well-remembered season of religious interest, and whose minds still retain vivid pictures of the scenes witnessed in connection with that remarkable work.
This awakening is spoken of by old residents as a “Great Reformation.” It seems to have been one of those waves of religious interest, which sometimes sweep over a wide region. First, there were tidings of grace from Pawtucket. Then from Attleboro and from Wrentham came great news of the Holy Spirit’s awakening and converting power. This was in the summer of 1815. In September, the shower of grace reached Foxboro, and found the people ready to welcome it. In a brief sketch of that revival by Warren Bird, he says: “The work was powerful from September to March. Many laid aside their secular business almost entirely. Young persons assembled in groups for serious conversation; and such as had obtained hope themselves were, often seen praying amidst a little circle of their inquiring and weeping associates. Religion was everywhere the subject of conversation, and but little else was seemingly attended to in the schools. About one hundred in different parts of the town gave hopeful evidence of a gracious change.” This was at a time when the entire population of the town was only about nine hundred.
The impetus given to Baptist interests by this revival was in this wise. Rev. Stephen S. Nelson was then pastor of the Baptist church in North Attleboro. “Early in this time of refreshing,” writes Mr. Bird, “he was invited to come over to Foxboro; and, having several times preached to crowded assemblies in private houses, he was called, in December, to baptize five persons. Besides some who went to Attleboro for the purpose, three others were baptized in January following, and soon after, six more.” Some of these meetings were held in Mr. Reed’s house, near the leather-mill in South Foxboro, and the converts were baptized in the pond close by. A member of this church, who was then and for a long time after numbered in the Congregational fold, retains a vivid impression of those baptismal scenes. She remembers Elder Nelson, coming up out of the water, singing in a strong clear voice these quaint words:
“John, although a man, baptizing began
Believers in Jordan, confessing their sins”
It is not to be supposed that Elder Nelson, in his preaching, shunned to declare the believer’s whole duty, and hence it is not strange that “the first impressions of many of the converts in this revival were,” as Mr. Bird says, “in favor of believers’ baptism, as that alone, which could be the answer of a good conscience towards God.”
On the 11th of March, 1816, the first step was taken towards giving to Baptist principles a permanent establishment in this town. This step was the organization of a Baptist Society, whose declared object was, “to promote vital piety, and maintain the public worship of God.” This society was composed of persons who favored Baptist sentiments, though it was not wholly composed of baptized persons. It still maintains a flourishing existence, and has always acted in entire harmony with the church with which it is allied, and in whose behalf it assumes the care of its house of worship and the task of raising the funds needed to meet its current expenses.
In April, 1816, five more persons were baptized, and united with the Baptist church in North Attleboro, four of whom had been members of the Congregational church here. These four were, of course, called to account for breaking covenant with their church. In their reply, they say : “We confess with shame our omission duly and prayerfully to consult the lively oracles [Word] of God, to learn our duty when we first made a profession of faith; but as our attention has since been called to this subject in regard to Baptism and several things connected with it, and as we hope we have, in the fear of God, examined His word upon it, so we trust that we have been enlightened to see, and strengthened to perform, a duty, which is imperiously binding on every believer, and which we feel that we had originally neglected.” It is due to the memory of these original confessors of our faith in this town, that we hear their own reasons for making the change, which to many seemed causeless, if not wicked.
As a branch of the church in North Attleboro, the few baptized believers in these distant neighborhoods, poor, and widely scattered over the two towns of Foxboro and Mansfield, strove, in their feebleness, to uphold the cause they loved. In September, 1816, three more received baptism. They were occasionally visited by their pastor, Elder Nelson, who preached and administered the ordinances from time to time.
But this branch was too far from the parent stock to flourish long in its dependent relation. It must strike its own roots in the soil. A new center of life and organization was needed to hold the scattered members together. Finally, on the 30th of January, 1817, with devout desires for divine direction, thirty-three members of the Baptist church in North Attleboro requested dismission, for the purpose of forming a separate church in this place. The request was granted, February 16th, and on April 16th, these from Attleboro, with four others from Sharon, were regularly and solemnly constituted a visible church of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Of the thirty-seven, who composed this church at its organization, there were eighteen males and nineteen females. Many of their names are cherished with admiring recollections of long and faithful service; and some of those, who, in the freshness and vigor of youth, on that day entered into a covenant of love and fellowship, still remain, flourishing in the courts of the Lord in their old age, able still to be an example to younger members of the church in their love for the public worship of God and the preaching of the Word. There was Ezra Carpenter, who had been a soldier for independence in the Revolution, and was not afraid nor ashamed to assist again in the support and defense of a feeble, struggling cause. There was Martin Torrey, a man of staunch fidelity and firmness, who was straightforward in word and deed, and who, if he sometimes seemed severe, was always true and kind at heart. There was John Allen, whose kindly face we hoped would grace this occasion, but who, by age and feebleness, is to-day confined to his home in East Providence. There, after more than forty years spent in leading many to righteousness, he is waiting, at the age of fourscore years and six, for the crown that shall be his. There were Francis Carpenter and Boxana Story, who soon afterwards entered into a new and more tender bond of fellowship [marriage!], and remain to this day living witnesses of the grace that saves the soul, and supports it in times of trial. There was Eliza Bradshaw, whom we all know as sister Guild, whose willing feet still seek the place where God’s children meet to worship Him. And there was the name of Jerusha Skinner, long since exchanged for Alexander, who, in a ripe old age, has lived to see her descendants, to the third generation, follow her steps in baptism. Of the original thirty-seven, six are known to be living, though but three of them still remain members of this church.
To be continued next week…
A Brief History of the Baptist Church in Foxborough, MA
Up until the mid-1800s what we call “churches” were called “meeting houses.” I appreciate this. The church is a body of believers, not a building.
As Orwell Bible Church is taking initial steps toward having our own permanent meeting house, I’ve been reading different books about this. One interesting tome I came across is Historical Discourse Delivered at the Rededication of the Baptist Meeting-House in Foxborough, Mass, published in 1879. Listen to the concluding words of this account:
The history of this church presents little that is of striking interest. There has been nothing remarkable to record. Nor is there anything to regret in this fact. A quiet history is one of the results of harmony and discretion in the conduct of affairs. This church has never been given to hasty, impulsive counsels. On the contrary, it may justly be called somewhat slow and conservative. It does not take quickly to new methods. It clings to the things that have been tried and proved.
When the Lord moved in an unusual manner (called an awakening or revival) in the winter of 1879, the church said,
It was manifestly a work of the Holy Spirit, and was traceable to no special instrumentalities or methods of work. It seemed to be the result of the faithful use of the ordinary means of grace—the ministry of the Word and prayer.
I greatly appreciate these sentiments, and pray that the Lord will help Orwell Bible Church and others to strive for harmony and discretion, faithfully using the means God has provided–the Word of God and prayer.
Historical Discourse
Delivered at the Rededication of
the Baptist Meeting-House in Foxborough, Mass., January 22, 1879
By William H. Spencer, Pastor
We are assembled to-day for a two-fold purpose. First, we desire, with fitting ceremony, to dedicate anew this renovated structure to the sacred uses of religion. With glad and solemn vows of consecration, we would again set apart to the worship of God this house, in which He has, in days past, manifested His power. It is the old house, dear to us all, and yet it is, in nearly all visible respects, a new one. It has passed under the hands of workmen of all kinds, it has been raised to a new plane, it has assumed new and larger dimensions, and, by including within its walls a convenient place for the administration of the ordinance of baptism, it may claim to be more truly a Baptist church than ever before. It is fitting, therefore, that we renew the solemn forms of dedication, in which other men gave this house to the Lord nearly a generation since.
In connection with this solemn service, another object presents itself to us. While we look into the future with hope, we remember also that we have a record to look back upon with gratitude. There are special reasons for making this a day of review and commemoration. Our Jubilee Anniversary came in the interim between two pastorates, and so passed by without notice. Nearly twelve years have gone by since then. There still remain, however, a few of the original members of the church, who remember the former things of old, and are able to show them to us. We cannot expect to keep them with us long, but before they pass on out of our sight, we would stand with them on one of the mountain-tops in our journey, and trace the way by which we have come.
Another reason for a historical review is found in the fact that the year just past has been a year of memories for the whole town. We have had brought before us a view of the progress of the community, in its secular interests, during the first century of its corporate existence. It is fitting that a review should be made of our religious history also. And if, within the year, our brethren of the Congregational church observe their centennial anniversary by making a similar review of their origin and history, a fair degree of completeness will be reached in the pleasing work of review and commemoration.
The rise and progress of Baptist sentiments in this town are included within the present century. In a brief sketch of the origin of this church by Warren Bird, he says, referring to something that took place in 1804: “Brother Caleb Atherton and wife, who now resided in a remote comer, were, probably, at this time, the only baptized persons in the town.” They lived in East Foxboro, about one mile from where the railroad station now stands, and were members of the Baptist church at Taunton Green. Mr. Atherton was blind; and yet, such was the devotion of this couple to their own church, that they were often seen, on Sunday morning, walking together to Taunton Green, twelve miles distant, and returning the same day. Such an example is worth remembering by the present generation of church members.
For at least ten years after the date given above, or as late as 1814, a Baptist was a rare object to meet in this town. Our aged sister, Clarissa Torrey, remembers the first baptism that ever took place within the town limits, so far as is known. The candidate was Mrs. Esther Hewes, whose descendants to the fourth generation are members with us to-day. She was baptized in the year 1808, perhaps earlier, by Rev. James Read of North Attleboro, whose labors were abundant in this whole region during the first fourteen years of this century. The baptism took place in the pond in South Foxboro connected with the factory now used in the manufacture of leather-board. Joshua Stearns, a brother of Mrs. Hewes, and his daughter, Patty Stearns, were also immersed some years before there was any prospect of the formation of a Baptist church here. The daughter is remembered as a woman of excellent spirit and good understanding.
Besides these five persons, no others in this town are known to have embraced Baptist sentiments until about 1814. At that time, it was the custom of Baptist ministers to visit neighborhoods beyond the limits of their own towns, to hold meetings in dwelling-houses, and preach the Word wherever they could find willing listeners. Some of our aged members recall the preaching of Rev. William Gammell of Medfield, Rev. Henry Kendall of Sharon, and Rev. Thomas Paul, a colored preacher of Boston, in the houses of Mr. Fairbanks and Philip Hewins, still standing, near Mr. Frank Boyden’s place.
In October, 1814, a Baptist church was constituted in Sharon. Some of its constituent members lived in Foxboro, and had been converted under the preaching of the men just referred to. They were probably baptized in Billings’s pond, one of the most beautiful places for the administration of the ordinance in the whole region, but, unfortunately too far from any church for convenient use. It was here that our sainted sister, Clarissa Comey, was baptized by Rev. Henry Kendall, when it was necessary to cut away the ice for the purpose.
But the time for the formation of a Baptist church in this town had not yet come; nor were circumstances favorable to the growth of a new denomination here. It was a time of coldness and dearth in religion throughout the community. The few scattered ones, who had felt constrained to give the answer of a good conscience by submitting to immersion at the hands of a Baptist minister, were looked upon as promoters of a needless division among brethren. We must not judge too harshly the men and women who opposed us in those days. There were devout, earnest souls among them, zealous for the truth; but they had not breathed the atmosphere of true religious liberty. The old church of the Standing Order, in this town, had already seen a temporary division in its own ranks, caused by the ordination of a minister, who had decided leanings towards Unitarianism; and now this new sect appeared to threaten the unity and harmony of the church from another quarter. It is true, there was a devout, religious earnestness, and a loyalty to the Word of God in these converts and proselytes to the new faith, which ought to have won respect for their opinions; still it is not strange that they did not. It was the misfortune of the Baptists, as it always has been everywhere, that their whole position was not recognized by their opponents. They have been reproached for building a new sect on a single point of outward ceremony; but they were no less peculiar and divergent from the Standing Order in their claim for absolute freedom in religious concerns, which was, and is, a stronghold of their position. For this, if for nothing else, there was abundant reason for the rise and growth of the Baptist denomination in the world, as well for the preservation and purity of other denominations as for its own sake. If I am not mistaken, all our friends join with us today, at least in thanking God for the full recognition throughout the land of this dearly-bought liberty, to think and to worship God according to the bidding of conscience; a result, which is due, in no small degree, to the persistence of the Baptists.
To be continued next week…
Conclusion of an account of a Revival of Religion in Farmington, Conn., in the year 1799
This is the second part of the account with part 1 here and part 2 here.
Another person, rising of 20 years of age, gave me a narrative, of which the following is an abstract.
“My advantages have been great from a child; and I have often had some concern of mind respecting religion; but nothing very special, till the time of the religious attention in this society four or five years ago. I was then considerably impressed, but my concern soon left me in a great measure, and I lived in a state of carelessness and stupidity, till the beginning of the fall of 1793. About this time, a solemn providence was made the means of alarming me, and awakening my attention to my spiritual condition and prospects. My anxiety for a time was great; but it was not long before I began to entertain a hope that I was in a safe state, and was much relieved. But soon I became convinced that I was in the gall of bitterness and bond of iniquity; and that my hope had been without any just foundation. My anxiety, therefore, returned, and continued more or less till the winter following. In February, before any appearance of uncommon attention in the society, my conviction and distress of mind greatly increased.
I had a clear sense of my sin, and experienced sensible opposition of heart to God, and to the doctrines of the gospel which I heard preached. I was convinced of their truth, and yet hated them. Often when I have heard them held up with plainness, in the house of God, on the Sabbath, I have wished that I could be absent. To be obliged to sit and hear things so disgusting, and which I knew to be the truth, was exceedingly painful. The Bible also, was to me a most odious book. I could not endure to read it. Every page appeared to be against me. While in this situation, I looked on every side for relief. I fled to everything for refuge, but to God. For a time I strove hard to disbelieve the doctrines of the gospel. I searched diligently to find arguments against them—particularly the doctrine of the endless future punishment of the wicked. I listened to the arguments of the Universalists—I endeavored to persuade myself that God was such a merciful being that he never would punish any of mankind, or at least, not with endless punishment whatever might be their treatment of him, and of his Son in this life. But all was in vain the Scriptures were decisive—and I was obliged to acknowledge the necessity of religion, and of an interest in Christ, in order to any true peace in this, or another world. Accordingly I set myself very earnestly as I thought, to obtain it—labored hard to make my heart better, and to recommend myself to the Savior. But finding all attempts of this kind fail, and finding that the opposition of my heart increased, I fled for refuge to antinomianism [Christians have no law they are to obey]. I thought it must be impossible for a sinner to love God, as long as he supposed his sins were unforgiven, and that God was his enemy. I, therefore, endeavored to think that Christ had died for me, in particular, and that my sins were all pardoned;—hoping that if I could persuade myself of this, it would give me peace, and be unto me according to my faith, or as I now view it, my vain self-flattering. But I was not permitted to wrap myself up in this delusion. I next attempted to persuade myself that there was no such thing as free moral agency, or accountability, nor any distinction between virtue and vice—but that mankind were mere machines, actuated by a blind and fatal necessity. But I was unable to reason myself into a belief of this. I had a consciousness of sin and guilt which I could not throw off. I felt my desert of misery, and of the perfect reasonableness of my being required to give my heart to God. My heart, however, was still opposed,—his character and conduct I did not love—especially his leaving me in this situation when he was able to deliver me, and did deliver others, and give them hope and comfort. And whenever I heard of any particular instance of this, it caused the opposition of my heart to rise very high. I was told that I must submit. I attempted to do it, and to flatter myself that I did submit—But my submission would last no longer than till the character of God came clearly into view again. After these things, I had a lively sense of the hypocrisy I had been guilty of in everything I had been doing—that in all my strivings, I had had no sincerity or regard to God ; but had been actuated in everything by perfect selfishness—that all my cries to God, had been mere mockery—flowing from a heart totally opposed to him—that in every prayer I had made for the Holy Spirit, God had seen that it was not from the heart; but that my heart and words were at perfect variance. Never before, had I such an idea of the plague of my heart, or of the sensible enmity against God, which an awakened sinner may be the subject of. My distress was now such that 1 thought I could not endure it. I slept but little; and whenever I awoke from sleep, my distress and anguish came upon me in a moment. I used to think that if I could be relieved for a few moments, it would be more tolerable. But I had no relief—and what added exceedingly to my distress, was the thought that it would probably not only be constant, but forever.
“But notwithstanding all my distress, I greatly dreaded the thought of falling back into my former stupidity—being convinced that if I was given up to carelessness, I should perish, and that the light and conviction I had resisted would greatly aggravate my condemnation.
“After continuing a while in this state, doubts began to rise in my mind, respecting the divinity of the Scriptures. I questioned whether the Bible was the word of God, and I even sometimes harbored the thought that there was no God. This, when I came to reflect upon it, increased, if possible, my distress. I viewed it as an evidence that I was left of God—and that I was about to be given up to delusion to believe a lie. I now began to despair of ever being brought to repentance. And for a considerable time, except at intervals, I chose death rather than to continue in life. I thought there was no happiness for me in this world, nor in the next—and that the longer I lived, the more intolerable would be my future misery. In these dreadful moments of despair, the most shocking temptations would rush upon me, urging me to destroy myself. But through the mercy of God, I was preserved from a compliance with them.
“While under these temptations, and during all the time of my greatest distress, I was very careful to conceal my feelings and exercises. For this purpose, I kept much alone, and endeavored to avoid conversation as much as possible. I felt ashamed, and afraid to let the state of my mind be known—judging from my own former views and feelings respecting such things, that were I to relate what I had experienced, no person would credit me ; and that I should be considered either as delirious, or disposed to deceive. I am now fully convinced that my conduct, in this respect, was unwise and injurious. Had I freely opened my mind to some person acquainted with the exercises of sinners under conviction, and the devices of Satan to destroy them, I might have been much relieved under the despair and temptations I experienced, and perhaps wholly prevented from falling into them. But God is wise in all he has permitted to take place. And he is infinitely merciful; or when I was thus guilty of the heinous sin of despairing of his mercy, I should have been immediately destroyed.
“It was several months after I began to be delivered from that despair and peculiar distress which I have mentioned, before I entertained a hope that the enmity of my heart was subdued. I fix not on any particular time when this took place, if ever. I am far from being confident respecting myself. I know the heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked. Yet, for the most part, I entertain a hope, grounded upon the submission and peace which, if I am not deceived, I sometimes find in contemplating the character of God, and the Savior, and the truths and precious promises of his Word, and in a desire to be conformed to his holy will.”
Continuation of an Account of a Revival of Religion in Farmington, Conn., in the year 1799
This is the second part of the account that began here.
I shall now give a summary account of several particular cases.
The first is of a man about 30 years old; of a religious family, and of a good understanding. He was in the view of the world, a good man a praying man; and one who was not considered by any who were acquainted with him as inclined to be enthusiastic, or subject to any uncommon dejection, or gloominess of mind. As he had enjoyed special advantages by means of a religious education, to know himself, and be influenced to his duty, so he was called upon, and peculiarly tried by distressing and alarming providences—particularly by the very sudden death of his two only sons, within a few days of each other, in the fall of 1798. This distressing scene awakened him to some concern, and attention at first, but it very soon passed off, and he became as careless and inattentive as ever—living, however, as before, in the formal observance of family religion, and external morality. At length, in the month of February following, God was pleased by his almighty Spirit, to fix that conviction of sin, and sense of guilt on his mind which the most powerful means, and awakening calls of God’s providence and Word, had not been able to do. From this time, I shall give the exercises of his mind as I took them from his mouth.
“I was first awakened at a lecture in a neighboring society. I was in great distress under a sense of sin, and my distress continued and increased for two or three weeks, when I found a sermon by Dr. Doddridge upon the diversity of the operations of the Spirit. Before this I had no idea that I had experienced anything of true religion; but after reading that book, I began to feel more easy. For several days, I thought I loved to pray and to read the Scriptures. But the next Sabbath I heard a discourse which in some measure, confounded me. The design of it was, to describe the nature of true religion, and distinguish it from that which originates in selfishness. The observations appeared to be just and Scriptural, and yet to be against me. A few days after this, I began to have heart-risings against God, and was filled with pain and opposition, whenever I saw others appear to delight in God and religion. After this, I had a greater sense of the plague of my heart, than ever before. My mind had been more fixed before this, upon particular out-breakings of sin. But now I was led to a sight and sense of the fountain of wickedness within me, from which all had flowed—and I was convinced that I was an enemy to God. Before this, when I thought or spoke of my sins, I often shed tears; but now I was unable to weep. I considered this at that time, as the effect of a greater degree of hardness and stupidity. And it appeared to me to be occasioned by conversing with Christians and ministers. The more I conversed with them, the more hard and unfeeling I seemed to grow; and it was suggested to my mind that I had better wholly avoid them.
“About the first of April, my distress of mind was so great, that I had no appetite for food, and could get but little rest by night or day. For about two months I rarely slept more than half an hour or an hour in the night. In several instances, I spent the whole night without sleep, in great agony of mind, looking one way and another for relief. At one of these times, my mind turned upon the subject of the truth of the Scriptures. I queried whether there was not some ground to hope that the Bible would prove to be false. It appeared that if I could believe there was, it would give me relief; but I could not for a moment. I knew and felt it to be the truth and the word of God, though I had no love for it. I could therefore find no relief; but was filled with such an apprehension of the miseries of the damned, that I thought I should lose my reason. My health was now brought so low, by means of the anguish of my mind, and want of rest, that I was obliged entirely to desist from labor, and apply to a physician. And as I viewed myself one of the greatest sinners in the world, I thought it likely God was about to take me out of the world, and destroy me as an example and warning to others. Indeed my distress was so great that I did not wish to live, and I began to be under temptations to destroy myself.
“Being at this time unable to attend public worship, I did not regret it; for preaching, or religious conversation, or whatever brought up the character of God, was exceedingly painful to me. I was unwilling also that my wife or friends should attend meeting, and I tried to prevent them; for I could not endure to have them or any others enjoy any comfort and satisfaction in religion. The happiness of others in religion, and the service of God, was a source of torment to me. I found also, as I thought, that I did not love my friends; and that I had not that regard and tenderness for my wife and child which I used to have. And whenever I heard of any person being of a good disposition, it would cause my heart to boil with a kind of envy.
“After I had arrived at this pitch, I would willingly have given ten thousand worlds, if it had been in my power, to have been deprived of my reason. My conscience stung me so that I should have been willing to change circumstances with a toad, or the meanest and vilest creature that ever was. I would have given anything to be put out of existence. I thought if I knew that thousands of years would end the miseries of hell, it would give me some relief. I thought if I could justify myself, and cast the blame upon God, this would relieve my distress. But I felt this to be impossible; and I saw my heart so opposed to God, that I concluded I was left by his Spirit, and was in an unpardonable state. A great part of the time, I was in total despair, and thought I felt as miserable as the damned. No one who has not experienced it can have any idea of the distress which I endured. I don’t think but that I could have sat down and put both my feet into the fire, and held them there, and bore the pain more easily than to bear what I did in my mind.
“I continued in this state of mind from the forepart of August till the latter part of September, or beginning of October. About this time, I began to entertain some hope that I was reconciled to God. I thought I could take pleasure in meditating on the divine character, and those doctrines of the gospel, which had once been so painful. It appeared that all God’s ways were right, and all his requirements reasonable, and that it would be the greatest happiness to be able to serve him. Soon after, I heard a sermon from the words, ‘My grace is sufficient for thee.’ It was a text and subject which came with great power and comfort to my mind; and it appeared now more than ever to be reasonable and desirable to submit myself into the hand of God, to be disposed of by him as he pleases.”
Upon being asked whether he could fix upon any particular time in which he was renewed and humbled, if ever—he replied, “I cannot; and I often have great fears that I never have been truly humbled. But, at times, if my heart does not deceive me, I feel a happiness in meditating on the character of God, and in the thought that I am in his hands, and that all things are at his wise disposal. And though for the most part, I indulge a hope in his mercy through Jesus Christ, yet I am sensible that in myself I am infinitely unworthy, and ill-deserving; and that it would be perfectly just and righteous in God to cast me off. And if this should be my portion, and it should finally appear that I had been left for my great wickedness, to deceive myself with a false hope, I could have nothing to say.”
Upon being asked what his present feelings were, towards careless, impenitent sinners, he replied, “I feel that they are to be pitied. It seems when I reflect upon it, as if I could not bear the thought of any one going on, and finally suffering such a hell as I have tasted. An eternity of such distress as I experienced for a time in my breast, by a view of the divine character, and the happiness of others in serving God, would be intolerably dreadful.”
This account will continue next week!

